Newsflash


Write Your Congress Person about this issue Read More about conscience protection at USCCB

In 1634, a mix of Catholic and Protestant settlers arrived in Southern Maryland from England aboard the Ark and the Dove.  They had come at the invitation of the Catholic Lord Baltimore,who had been granted the land by the Protestant King Charles I of England.  While Catholics and Protestants were killing each other in Europe, Lord Baltimore imagined Marylandas a society where people of different faiths could live together peacefully.  This vision was soon codified in Maryland’s 1649 Act Concerning Religion (also called the “Toleration Act”), which was the first law in our nation’s history to protect an individual’s right to freedom of conscience.

Maryland’s early history teaches us that, like any freedom, religious liberty requires constant vigilance and protection, or it will disappear.  Maryland’s experiment in religious toleration ended within a few decades.  The colony was placed under royal control and the Church of England became the established religion.  Discriminatory laws, including the loss of political rights, were enacted against those who refused to conform.  Catholic chapels were closed and Catholics were restricted to practicing their faith in their homes.  The Catholic community lived under this coercion until the American Revolution.

By the end of the 18th century our nation’s founders embraced freedom of religion as an essential condition of a free and democratic society.  So when the Bill of Rights was ratified, religious freedom had the distinction of being the First Amendment.  Religious liberty is indeed the first liberty.

This is our American heritage, our most cherished freedom. If we are not free in our conscience and our practice of religion, all other freedoms are fragile.  If our obligations and duties to God are impeded, or even worse, contradicted by the government, then we can no longer claim to be a land of the free. Is our most cherished freedom truly under threat?

Among many current challenges, consider the recent Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate requiring almost all private health plans to cover contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.  For the first time in our history, the federal government will force religious institutions to facilitate drugs and procedures contrary to our moral teaching, and purport to define which religious institutions are “religious enough” to merit an exemption.  This is not a matter of whether contraception may be prohibited by the government. It is not even a matter of whether contraception may be supported by the government.  It is a matter of whether religious people and institutions may be forced by the government to provide coverage for contraception and sterilization, even when it violates our religious beliefs.

Taken from the USCCB Conscience protection initiative- READ MORE.

What You Can Do!

1) PRAY - Follow the following links to guided prayer cards to our Lord with the intercession of our Blessed Mother and St. Thomas More.

Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of the Americas

Mary Immaculate, Patroness of Our Country

St. Thomas More, Patron of Religious Freedom

2) Write to Congress & HHS opposing the mandate and calling for conscience protections. !!!Deadline = June 19!!!

Click HERE to electronically write Congress (with an optional pre-written letter) voicing your conscience protection concerns.

3) Read more about the issue and decide what action is best for you.

USCCB CONSCIENCE PROTECTION WEBSITE

 

 

 

plus minus gleich

Mass Times:    M-F 7:15am   M&W 5:15pm   Sat 4:30pm, 6:00pm(Kor)   Sun  8:30am, 10:30am, 12:30pm(Spa), 5:30pm   Confession Sat 3-4:00pm

Religious Liberty, What is at stake?

Principles: dignity and family life

E-mail Print PDF

Humans are an elegant (and sometimes despicable) creature.  We create environment in which to live that is physical, psychological, and social to a degree unmatched on the globe.  By virtue of this knowing, and more, we act with intention.  Philosophically and religiously, human persons are to be respected, not used or abused; persons are never to be means to someone’s end.   This dignity is innate, foundational to being human.  The Church holds this principal on the grounds of “natural law”—it is true by virtue of reason and reflection.  Revelation only elevates this dignity to a greater degree (eternal life).   

The translation from philosophy/doctrine to practice has its challenges because the social milieu is mixed with a wide range of ideas, values, and power.  Social groups apportion power to certain elites.  The kingdom of God, however, includes as many as possible.  The litmus test of society or of the Church’s existence is how much dignity the voiceless or vulnerable have in word and action.  In the encyclical Social Teaching issues that come to the fore in the realm of human dignity are the unborn, the young or the elderly, family life, and the poor.  Catholic Social teaching borrows the term, ‘preferential option for the poor” from the Latin American bishops (Medellin, 1968). 

Always the challenge is to be broad enough in scope to see the anawim, the poor ones of God, and then to practice justice and mercy toward them.  The point is not to patronize the poor, but to work to assure that everyone—especially the poor—have the means to life and thrive.  Optimally, social policy and laws assure that everyone has access to the needs for food, shelter, health, education and public involvement.  This is a gigantic agenda with no perfect answer.  Clearly, when the church (e.g., preachers, bishops) speak out about policy or law, or about economic conditions, they are treading on territory where they are not experts.  Ideally, Catholic laity in these areas of service is more equipped to help apply the principal to the art of governing or of commerce.  Have at it!  Help society/the church to discern how best to protect unborn life.  Help society/the Church to discern how best to promote peaceful solutions to international problems without use of indiscriminate weapons (i.e., nuclear weapons) or of war at all.  Help society/the Church to discern how best to include poor families who lack basic social equipment to enter into the social milieu (i.e., education, loans).  What a wonderful opportunity for Catholics!

Family life has been a fairly constant theme in Catholic Social Teaching.  In part it started because of the ‘threats’ that industrialization made on family existence and survival (e.g., living wage, child labor, time off of work, opportunity worship); Pope Leo dealt with these in 1891.  The Vatican II document, Gaudium et Spes, called the family the “school of humanity.”  The social encyclicals speak of the essence of marriage as the mutuality (and complementarity) of the spouses (cf.1983 Code of Canon Law, #1055).  Families are the building blocks of every society…and the “domestic house-churches.” 

Topics that have not had much attention or explication in the social encyclicals are the role of women in society and in the church, the issue of domestic abuse—which is very problematic throughout the world—, globalization of work and how this has separated extended and nuclear family groups, and the danger of consumerism in family life.  So, there is still plenty to address in social concerns even with these two principals of dignity of the human person and family life.

 

Thank You for visiting St. Paul Catholic Newman Center