Newsflash


Write Your Congress Person about this issue Read More about conscience protection at USCCB

In 1634, a mix of Catholic and Protestant settlers arrived in Southern Maryland from England aboard the Ark and the Dove.  They had come at the invitation of the Catholic Lord Baltimore,who had been granted the land by the Protestant King Charles I of England.  While Catholics and Protestants were killing each other in Europe, Lord Baltimore imagined Marylandas a society where people of different faiths could live together peacefully.  This vision was soon codified in Maryland’s 1649 Act Concerning Religion (also called the “Toleration Act”), which was the first law in our nation’s history to protect an individual’s right to freedom of conscience.

Maryland’s early history teaches us that, like any freedom, religious liberty requires constant vigilance and protection, or it will disappear.  Maryland’s experiment in religious toleration ended within a few decades.  The colony was placed under royal control and the Church of England became the established religion.  Discriminatory laws, including the loss of political rights, were enacted against those who refused to conform.  Catholic chapels were closed and Catholics were restricted to practicing their faith in their homes.  The Catholic community lived under this coercion until the American Revolution.

By the end of the 18th century our nation’s founders embraced freedom of religion as an essential condition of a free and democratic society.  So when the Bill of Rights was ratified, religious freedom had the distinction of being the First Amendment.  Religious liberty is indeed the first liberty.

This is our American heritage, our most cherished freedom. If we are not free in our conscience and our practice of religion, all other freedoms are fragile.  If our obligations and duties to God are impeded, or even worse, contradicted by the government, then we can no longer claim to be a land of the free. Is our most cherished freedom truly under threat?

Among many current challenges, consider the recent Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate requiring almost all private health plans to cover contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs.  For the first time in our history, the federal government will force religious institutions to facilitate drugs and procedures contrary to our moral teaching, and purport to define which religious institutions are “religious enough” to merit an exemption.  This is not a matter of whether contraception may be prohibited by the government. It is not even a matter of whether contraception may be supported by the government.  It is a matter of whether religious people and institutions may be forced by the government to provide coverage for contraception and sterilization, even when it violates our religious beliefs.

Taken from the USCCB Conscience protection initiative- READ MORE.

What You Can Do!

1) PRAY - Follow the following links to guided prayer cards to our Lord with the intercession of our Blessed Mother and St. Thomas More.

Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of the Americas

Mary Immaculate, Patroness of Our Country

St. Thomas More, Patron of Religious Freedom

2) Write to Congress & HHS opposing the mandate and calling for conscience protections. !!!Deadline = June 19!!!

Click HERE to electronically write Congress (with an optional pre-written letter) voicing your conscience protection concerns.

3) Read more about the issue and decide what action is best for you.

USCCB CONSCIENCE PROTECTION WEBSITE

 

 

 

plus minus gleich

Mass Times:    M-F 7:15am   M&W 5:15pm   Sat 4:30pm, 6:00pm(Kor)   Sun  8:30am, 10:30am, 12:30pm(Spa), 5:30pm   Confession Sat 3-4:00pm

Religious Liberty, What is at stake?

If there be any excellence

E-mail Print PDF

I have discovered through some recent scholarship that among the communities that St. Paul established in his harrowing career as an apostle two, in particular, are outstanding: Philippi and Thessalonika.  Both of these fledgling communities are in northern Greece (Macedonia).  They were commercial centers, located along the Egnatia Road (Via Egnatia), a trade route between Rome and the East.  Two attributes about these two communities stand out in his mind: (1) they remained faithful to the message of Christ’s redemptive death and resurrection for them, and (2) they were generous.  These two communities basically subsidized Paul’s ministry, for instance, when he was in Corinth, and they were generous donors in support of the Church of Jerusalem.  The Christians in Jerusalem were particularly poor (some things don’t change even after centuries!).  What is more stunning, the Church of Jerusalem was always at odds with Paul over theology. They disagreed with the apostle about what was (or was not) necessary for inclusion in the church of Jesus Christ: the Jerusalemites were convinced of the necessity of obeying all of the Jewish Law (particularly the dietary requirements [kosher eating])—Jesus had not expressly denied that—whereas Paul’s experience led him to believe that this Law no longer applied to believers because, through the resurrection of Jesus from the dead, God established a new and novel access to Himself.  Baptism and a life of consistent dedication was sign enough of connection to God and salvation.

Every Christian community can apply the two attributes as a measure of how well they embrace the faith.  The fullness of faith is not a matter of being “legally correct”, much less “politically correct”, but of discovering the tremendous gift of redemption and living it.

So it is well to ask: how well do I understand and appreciate the mystery and power of redemption in my life?  This is a challenging question because we at St. Paul are a rather socially and intellectually sophisticated.  How often does sophistication shield one from seeing or admitting weakness or flaws?  Denial does not make the weakness or flaw any less real and I am subject to its potency to expose me or embarrass me by a momentary slip in behavior.  Christ, however, desires my renewal, and he has ‘the stuff’ to change me, called grace.  My access this grace is an open, humble heart.  I do not think my way to such a heart.  A potent avenue toward this is a retreat or working through a crisis situation.  Reflect a little on this.

And how generous is this church?  Well, we have surely responded to the Haiti tragedy with open pocketbooks (see the number in the bulletin)!  Another marker is our response to our mission as a university parish: campus outreach, mentoring the teen youth, care to the homebound and grieving, supporting persons in crisis, welcoming members from other countries.  Such response needs time investment (volunteers) and financial support.  These resources are still on a shoestring basis; the shoestring is not reaching far enough (more report to come).  There are enough members to supply the need, just the heart to participate.  How generous is each household be toward this goal?  Surely each household in Philippi wondered how much was enough to help to support their home community and Jerusalem besides.  Somehow they exemplified generosity enough to be an emblem of grace.

Today, would Paul add us to his list of most respected communities, noted for our conversion and generosity?  What do you think?

 

Thank You for visiting St. Paul Catholic Newman Center